NileScore.com
Non League Div One - Isthmian North

Lowestoft Town vs Brantham Athletic prediction, tips and odds

AI PREDICTIONS See more
WINNER Home Win
HOME GOALS Under 3.5
AWAY GOALS Under 1.5
See the full prediction
MATCH PREVIEW See more

Lowestoft Town host Brantham Athletic in the Non League Div One - Isthmian North on Saturday 27 September 2025. Lowestoft Town have 9 goals scored and 7 conceded in the last 5 (L W W W L), with both teams scoring in 3 of 5 and over 2.5 goals in 3 of 5.

Read the full preview
STATS COMPARISON See more
Lowestoft Town Brantham Athletic
100%
Form
0%
89%
Attack
11%
68%
Defense
32%
0%
H2H
0%
0%
Goals
0%
75.7%
Total
24.3%
RECENT FORM See more
Lowestoft Town3 wins in the last 5
LWWWL
Brantham Athletic2 wins in the last 5
WLWLL

Lowestoft Town vs Brantham Athletic prediction and tips

✦ AI PREDICTIONS
WINNER Home Win
HOME GOALS Under 3.5
AWAY GOALS Under 1.5

Lowestoft Town vs Brantham Athletic preview

Match

Lowestoft Town host Brantham Athletic in the Non League Div One - Isthmian North on Saturday 27 September 2025.

Lowestoft Town

Lowestoft Town have 9 goals scored and 7 conceded in the last 5 (L W W W L), with both teams scoring in 3 of 5 and over 2.5 goals in 3 of 5.

Brantham Athletic

Brantham Athletic have 6 goals scored and 9 conceded in the last 5 (L L W L W), with both teams scoring in 2 of 5 and over 2.5 goals in 2 of 5.

AI prediction

Our AI prediction: winner Home Win; home goals Under 3.5; away goals Under 1.5.

Betting stats

Last 5 results: betting stats
Lowestoft TownBrantham Athletic
Total goals per game3.23.0
Both teams scored3/52/5
Over 2.5 goals3/52/5
Clean sheets1/52/5

Updated

Lowestoft Town vs Brantham Athletic team comparison

100%
Form
0%
89%
Attack
11%
68%
Defense
32%
70%
Poisson
30%
0%
H2H
0%
0%
Goals
0%
75.7%
Total
24.3%
7
Played
7
2
Wins
0
3
Draws
1
2
Losses
6

1.4
Avg Scored
0.6
1.9
Avg Conceded
3.1

1
Clean Sheets
0
2
Failed to Score
4
1
Win Streak
0

Lowestoft Town vs Brantham Athletic head to head

No recent meetings

Check teams recent matches instead